From 4be93e4573dad343424ccd5efbeb3d4007a653c4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Zacchaeus.anon" Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2018 10:28:34 +0000 Subject: Published: /library/anonym-on-solidarity-and-the-institutional-progressive-en #974 * 2018-08-04T10:28:18 submitting classic text -- zacchaeus --- ...lidarity-and-the-institutional-progressive-en.muse | 19 +++++++------------ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/a/ao/anonym-on-solidarity-and-the-institutional-progressive-en.muse b/a/ao/anonym-on-solidarity-and-the-institutional-progressive-en.muse index 93ed7a4..a977d49 100644 --- a/a/ao/anonym-on-solidarity-and-the-institutional-progressive-en.muse +++ b/a/ao/anonym-on-solidarity-and-the-institutional-progressive-en.muse @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ #author _anonym #LISTtitle Solidarity and the Institutional Progressive #date 02/28/2013 -#source Retrieved on 08/04/2018 from http://nineinchbride.com/index.php/author-blog-commentary/entry/on-solidarity-and-the-institutional-progressive.html +#source Retrieved on 08/04/2018 from [[http://nineinchbride.com/index.php/author-blog-commentary/entry/on-solidarity-and-the-institutional-progressive.html][nineinchbride.com]] #lang en #pubdate 2018-08-04T10:26:19 @@ -38,17 +38,12 @@ What then makes a progressive publisher? What justification can be made for an online progressive institution to wall up and practice the bourgeois arts of Big House exclusion? Ultimately there is no credibility to their litany of excuses: -- we're swamped with just the print-house books - -- too much junk in indie pub-land - -- no staff, no time, no money - -- more important books, higher priority to other coverage - -- people don't want to know about people they've never heard of - -- doesn't sell ad space + - we're swamped with just the print-house books + - too much junk in indie pub-land + - no staff, no time, no money + - more important books, higher priority to other coverage + - people don't want to know about people they've never heard of + - doesn't sell ad space If their premise is that they are an extractive capitalist fiefdom with no obligation beyond their castle walls, they can make these and like arguments, essentially business excuses for not spending time or money on principle, the excuse of the apolitical movie star, minus the wealth. In due course of time, they will be forced to overcome all of these objections anyway, when the Random Houses of the world are leveled in the independent digital juggernaut. -- cgit v1.2.3